Showing posts with label India and FDI policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label India and FDI policy. Show all posts

Monday, August 26, 2013

Generous to foreigners

Generous to foreigners

Source: By Ashwani Mahajan: Deccan Herald

If foreign companies purchase shares from FIIs, most of the Indian companies may go into foreign hands.

The Companies Bill, approved by Parliament last week, was in works for the last two decades. After passage of the Bill on August 8 by Rajya Sabha, the path to the new Companies Act, 2013 is now clear. It is said that the new law was framed in view of the requirements arising out of expansion and development of Indian economy. After a Parliamentary Standing Committee submitted its report in August 2010, the government withdrew the earlier bill and a new Companies Bill was drafted incorporating suggestions from various stakeholders.  This new Companies Bill 2011 was presented in Parliament during the winter session of 2011. It is notable that according to changed circumstances, Companies Act 1956 was amended number of times. However, for the first time, altogether a new Companies Bill was passed in Parliament.

Apart from other things, there are several new provisions in the newly approved bill, which includes provisions with regard to corporate social responsibility, mandatory rotation of auditors, independent directors, one-man company etc. Of course, when a new law is enacted, it is expected that it will help solve the problems with respect to the existing law. In Indian context, obvious expectation from the new law would be that it would facilitate future development of the country and would also end the worries of the commoners exploited and cheated by the corporate world.

If we take cognizance of the problems of the public from the existing laws, we find that several new companies were created, publishing balance sheets and other books of accounts in a fraudulent manner.

These companies siphoned off more than Rs 16,000 crore from the public and vanished. But Department of Company Affairs, Government of India could not dare take any action against promoters of such companies. However, though there are sufficient provisions against fraudulent balance sheets and books of accounts, such promoters and managers have never been subject to any major conviction except small penalties. Satyam’s  Ramalinga Raju is also out on bail after a short spell of 2 years in jail despite a fraud of more than Rs 8,000 crores. Some employees of the auditing company were sent behind the bars.

Generally, we come across the cases of insider trading. Insider trading means trading (buying and selling) of shares by promoters and directors of the company. Insider trading is illegal and causes heavy loss to general investors. Though many cases have been brought to light by enlightened experts, hardly have we found any major conviction in such cases except imposition of fines, that too after a prolonged struggle. Rarely do we find suo motu action by the government, its agencies or regulators.

Lack of will power

In addition to these, many cases of violation of Company Law have been brought to light from time to time. It is not that the existing Indian Company Law lacked provision to deal with these problems. The problem is not in the law as there are enough provisions within the framework of law. The problem is actually that the government lacks the will power to enforce the law.

Though the new law fails to provide any solution for most of the problems of investors, introduction of exit provision seems to be good for small investors. As per this provision, if promoters holding majority shares in the company decide to go for merger with or acquisition of other companies and the minority shareholders are not satisfied with this decision, they will have the right to exit from the company. Such minority shareholders would be compensated and their shares purchased by the promoters at a price as per the formula devised for this purpose. For the first time in independent India’s history, investors will not only have a right to object to a proposal of majority but can also exit the company.

Still, there is a problem in this provision. As per the prevailing law, a promoter cannot hold more than 75 per cent of shares and in case of small investors deciding to exercise exit provision, the holding of a promoter may exceed 75 per cent, which will be in circumvention of the law.

A new provision has been added with regard to acquisition of the companies. As per the existing laws, a foreign company can purchase majority stake in an Indian company but it cannot merge the same with itself. However, this provision is now being amended. A company constituted under a foreign law can acquire an Indian company and merge the same with itself. Similarly, an Indian company can acquire a foreign company and merge the same with itself.

How many Indian companies would be able to acquire foreign companies, only time will tell? However, this provision will definitely clear the roadblocks in the way of acquisition of Indian companies by foreign companies. It is no secret that presently Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) own a significant proportion of shares of Indian companies. If foreign companies purchase these shares from FIIs, most of the Indian companies may go into foreign hands. It is in this context that new law seems to be over-generous towards foreign investors.

Though the bill says that rules would be framed to regulate such overseas acquisitions, it is expected that in order to protect national interests, this provision should be done away with.

Courtesy: http://www.ksgindia.com/study-material/today-s-editorial/8776-19-august-2013.html

Friday, August 9, 2013

Sacrificing FDI

Sacrificing FDI
Source: By SL Rao: Deccan Herald

The current account deficit (CAD) in the balance of payments has been at record levels. It has improved a little, but the precipitate decline of the Rupee, now at over Rs 60 to the US. dollar, spells doom for many companies and for India’s foreign debt. The same borrowings are now much more in rupee value. Balance sheets will show much higher debt in rupees and much higher interest payments in rupees.

This CAD is due to excessive imports, declining exports, not matched by growth in net earnings on foreign investments or on cash transfers. Our major imports are oil, coal and gold. The rupee value of these are now much more because of the decline in the rupee’s external value. It could be made up by foreign institutional and foreign direct investment. The former has been coming but is now withdrawing to the safety of the dollar in the USA. The latter has been and remains weak.

The situation is accompanied by and is a result of the sharp falls in growth, inflation continuing for over two years, declining investment and high government deficits. Poor growth is related to poor investment. Investment is sluggish. High interest rates and the declining foreign exchange value of the rupee are two reasons. The deficit has been somewhat reduced by cuts in expenditures and on oil and gas subsidies and improved tax collection. But massive social welfare expenditures with the promise of more because of the Food Security Act keep the deficit at high levels. Inflation will therefore continue. Social welfare expenditures are stolen to a substantial extent by politicians and bureaucrats (estimates are by over 50 per cent). They do not also benefit many of the poor and deserving.

Land acquisition delays, slow environmental and forest clearances, absence of time bound bureaucratic clearances, honest investigative practices, slow Court judgments, to name a few, have kept away the investments. Nationalised coal mining has been inefficient and unable to dig as much coal out as is possible. Exports are depressed due to the sluggish world economy and the scams have affected major commodity exports like iron ore. Rising foreign investment could restore the balance of payments and stimulate the economy. Rising domestic investment (both private and public) would be an economic stimulus to growth. But there is strangely, more domestic investment going overseas than is invested in India. This is because of all the impediments listed earlier.

Foreign investment is not as confident about India as it was some years ago. That is not just because of the deteriorating macro economic factors (deficit, inflation, current account deficit, high interest rates, etc). The innumerable procedures before the many clearances are given, the enormous amount of time wasted in these procedures, the cost of these delays in unused human and financial resources, uncertain tax rules, retrospective tax demands, have combined to make foreign investors wary of investing in India. Between 2000-01 and 2011-12, direct investment rose from $ 3270 million to $ 22006 m and portfolio investment from $2590 m to $ 17171 m. Our dependence on the latter is high. They are volatile. Their seesawing inflows and outflows have made for frequent rises and falls in the stock market and rupee exchange rates.

Attractive destination

India compares poorly with China which has had consistent GDP growth, low inflation, current account surplus, superlative infrastructure and foreign direct investment. China has grown primarily because it was such an attractive destination for foreign direct investment. Low wages, productive labour and non-existent labour legislation have made it a great manufacturing destination. Like India, a significant amount was money belonging to non-residents. India actively encourages round tripping of Indian funds by treating investments from countries like Mauritius to their tax laws (no capital gains tax). For years, technology imports were controlled, royalty was low, bureaucratic approvals were many and time consuming.

Implicit policy was to encourage institutional portfolio investments and as institutional investments, external commercial borrowings and NRI remittances. FDI was more into buying existing businesses, not building new factories. India needs massive foreign investment especially in infrastructure (roads, power, ports, railways, airports, etc). The UPA government has promoted FDI in insurance, pension funds, multi-brand retail, etc, but the conditions imposed, changing rules, taxation uncertainties and regulatory frameworks, have prevented much investment. Decades of hostility to private investment, private profit and foreign investment continue. Society believes essential services (water, electricity, road transport, etc) must be free or cross-subsidised by suppliers. This has led to unbridled increases in deficits of state-owned enterprises in infrastructure.

We can become an important FDI destination and build a current account surplus, like China. But we should remove all restrictions on foreign investment including defence industries. There should be no cap nor compulsion to have local investment participation. Clearances must be simplified and speeded. Taxation should be stable, clear, and consistent. The bureaucracy and individual officers should be made responsible and accountable for time bound clearances. Land acquisition should be made easier even if it requires an ordinance in the absence of legislation. Present legislative changes will not help. Inflation should be controlled and for this government deficits must come down.
These policies should have been introduced in our years of high growth, low inflation, low current account and fiscal deficits. Today, government has no alternative but to get foreign money into our reserves by any means. But we should have a blueprint of what must be done when our situation allows it, to increase FDI significantly in foreign investment into India. The biggest stumbling block is the unspoken conspiracy between politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen, to encourage portfolio investment through many avenues.

Courtesy: http://www.ksgindia.com/study-material/today-s-editorial/8216-08-july-2013.html